Agnosticism
December 18th, 2005Pretty interesting discussion over at Pandagon about what it means to be an agnostic as opposed to an atheist. I’ve never given it much thought — it’s always seemed pretty cut and dried to me. We agnostics basically think that believing God exists and believing God doesn’t exist are both statements of faith with no basis. So we make neither. I honestly didn’t think there was more to say on the subject.
On the other hand, it seems like many people use the term casually to refer to a belief about the relative probability about god’s existence. As if atheists have a faith based belief that there is no god. But that’s really not a reasonable characterization. Certainly some are more strident than others, but it’s hard to imagine the existence of an atheist who’s certainty in the lack of god’s existence could be seen as so “flying in the face” of something that it would merit being called faith-based, or unreasonable. The label agnostic seems to be almost an accusation that were an atheist confronted with proof of god’s existence, he would deny it to maintain his atheism.
I don’t think that’s fair. I think that if a group of atheists were suddenly confronted with proof of God’s existence, some would immediately convert, some would remain skeptical. I do believe that Atheism is a religious belief, and atheists have just as much capacity to be unreasonable as anyone else. “There must be a rational explanation for this” is just as dogmatic a statement of faith as “Our father, who art in heaven…”





December 19th, 2005 at 11:54 am
Caught this entry in the Metro Express today, and boo I say to you, because you must be one of the legions of Emmy voters who wouldn’t tune out The West Wing for The Sopranos for years.
The same situation occured with The Sopranos when they lost Nancy Marchand, who played Tony Soprano’s mother Livia, in the third season. (If you’re DVD-inclined, it’s Season 3, Disc 1, “Proshai, Livushka”, I believe.) To give you an idea of how they dealt with it: for the funeral episode, there was CGI and editing work done (somewhat sloppily)… but the episode turned out as one of the best of the season. More troubling was the fact that the season required an extensive re-write as it happened during filming; I’m not sure where TWW is in their production schedule right now as far as this season and the next go, but it will be interesting to see how TWW handles it.
Still, as the Sopranos showed, the loss of a great actor is tough but survivable.
December 19th, 2005 at 12:05 pm
I’m told TWW has 14 of 22 episodes in the can for this season, and that Leo was supposed to be in 5 of the remaining 8. I guess the writers are pulling all-nighters right about now. I wonder if Sorkin left any crack in his desk…